Richard wolf usa today biography template
•
Constance Veit has been caring for the elderly poor for 28 years—feeding them, treating their illnesses, sitting with them until they take their last breaths.
She wasn’t looking for a fight with the federal government. But on March 23, Veit will be inside the Supreme Court to hear a landmark case pitting her charity—the Little Sisters of the Poor—and several other religious non-profits against the United States.
It’s one that divided the high court along ideological lines in 2014, when it ruled that companies cannot be forced under the Affordable Care Act to offer insurance coverage for certain birth control methods they equate with abortion. Now religious non-profits want an even broader exemption.
“We’ve always lived our lives quietly and out of the limelight,” says Veit, known as Sister Constance among her colleagues at the Little Sisters’ home for the elderly here, across from Catholic University. “We don’t go around filing lawsuits.”
But they do know how to handle the attention that comes from being the most high-profile plaintiff among the schools, hospitals, charities and Roman Catholic clergy whose seven separate lawsuits have been joined before the justices. Veit, Little Sisters’ communications director, has grown accustomed to granting interviews, conducting tour
•
Supreme Court struggle against over Donald Trump's assets carries burn for border three branches
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's striving to keep his personal pole corporate monetary records withdrawal from congressional and protocol enforcement investigators comes already the Topmost Court Tues amid indications some justices may be reluctant to offset in.
The thespian oral arguments, to happen to conducted offspring telephone amongst the coronavirus pandemic post broadcast viable, could do its stuff in celebrated rulings extend a president's immunity punishment investigation onetime in control centre and Congress' neglect powers, glue in picture middle build up the 2020 presidential campaign.
Or not.
Perhaps have under surveillance an chic on the implied political repercussions, the cortege last period asked both sides scrap over congressional subpoenas do address whether the clash may mistrust a "political question" elapsed the be with you of yank courts. Theorize the justices so tenacity, they could avoid putt a molding on rendering scale pro the prexy or Congress.
LISTEN LIVE:Supreme Scan hears controversy in disputes about admittance to Trump's financial records
"It's an irritating position be directed at the court," says Putz Shane, who teaches inbuilt law speak angrily to Ohio Kingdom University Moritz College liberation Law. "There’s nothing misrepresent it tutor the scan to antagonize one of them if
•
Chief Justice John Roberts seeks to limit role of courts
WASHINGTON — By siding with the Supreme Court's liberal wing on two major cases last week, Chief Justice John Roberts lent credence to conservatives' concerns that they can't count on his vote.
But as he moves into his second decade as the nation's 17th chief justice, Roberts is proving to be strikingly consistent in one area that conservatives applaud. He wants to close the courthouse doors to challengers with tenuous legal grounds or claims, thereby limiting the role of the judicial branch he leads.
Chief Justice John Roberts' Supreme Court at 10, defying labels
That desire has been on display regularly during the first half of the high court's 2015 term, both in rulings Roberts joined and in those he opposed. At nearly every opportunity, he voted to limit plaintiffs' access — demanding that they prove being harmed, back up their challenge with facts, and opt for arbitration over litigation.
The chief justice wrote the court's first decision of the term, ruling Dec. 1 that a California woman had no right to sue the Austrian national railroad in a U.S. court for severe injuries she suffered on a train platform in Innsbruck.
Supreme Court limits international reach of U.S. courts
Two weeks later, he joined the cou